<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Rightwing Horror Picture Show</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.civilianism.com/gate/2009/11/barely-functioning-tea-baggers-protest-gore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.civilianism.com/gate/2009/11/barely-functioning-tea-baggers-protest-gore/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:36:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Bugga</title>
		<link>http://www.civilianism.com/gate/2009/11/barely-functioning-tea-baggers-protest-gore/#comment-611</link>
		<dc:creator>Bugga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.civilianism.com/gate/?p=2414#comment-611</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s time for the Amerikan people to end their love affair with that family.  Your description above is spot-on.  The news media just falls over itself fawning over them.  As the media goes, so goes the nation.  The media says that people are looking to the son of jeb as the next best hope for a continuation of that dynasty and of all they have done for the United States.  Except for that little incident of tearing up the yard with a car and breaking into her house after an argument with his girlfriend, the media isn&#039;t bothered with that and considers him perfect for any public office.  They&#039;d probably reduce the age limit to make him fit tomorrow if they could do it.  People who don&#039;t have aristocratic blood in their background would be disqualified from most such jobs for these endearing youthful indiscretions.  There are different rules for different classes of people.  The cute little vandalism thing was just mentioned in passing in the media promo piece.  What it means is they&#039;re going to promote and probably get their wish in the future.  It would never have any impact on a political future if you have the right party or bloodline.  NBC hasn&#039;t been worth much for some time, but neither have the newspapers.  It&#039;s been the worst network, before Fox became what it was in the mid-90s, for a lot longer.  Around or before 2000, newspaper columnists were talking about how the most unqualified candidate wouldn&#039;t be such a bad thing because his running mate was the experienced head of Halliburton and former war secretary and how his office would be just a short distance down the hall if the texas governor had any real problems.  They were given the chance and both showed just what a heckuva job they could both do.  Whether they were successful or not depends on how you measure success.  What is certain is that they did not benefit the proletariat who never mattered to people like them anyway.  Speaking of which, why is the daughter of no. 2 on the tube all the time now?  Ever since that crew left, the daughter has been given a forum like no other spawn.  The media is there to influence opinion.  Planting non-news and endorsing and endearing people who have done nothing for the people they are supposed to work for and the people will be sentimental about what a great bunch of people and will be begging to have them remain in office or as high up as possible. Real reporting might actually ask about nine eleven as well as documentaries about what happened in the 1930s with Smedley Butler.  Guess which patriarch of which dynastic family was implicated in that?  Instead, you are treated to nonsense.  Chelsea was not a troublemaker and she did her work without doing anything embarrassing.  She was mercilessly treated by people who made a lot of unfunny jokes at her expense.  The same mindless set got so upset at anyone who dared utter a syllable of disapproval against less restrained young people in another family.  Why would anyone want to have anything to do or listen to anything that family has to say?  They managed to run up an impossible debt and bring a nation to the abyss with 2 wars of choice.  This running up of debt worked against the incumbent in 1992.  Yet, 8 years later, people knowing what it had been like under the same mindset were happy to submit to it and ran to it for protection after having been failed during the awful attacks in New York, PA and Washington.  It didn&#039;t go well for the victims of Katrina because the relative pittance for levee repairs couldn&#039;t be found.  Halliburton received a whole lot more and delivered nothing.  It all seems to be working out very nicely for the family of which you speak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s time for the Amerikan people to end their love affair with that family.  Your description above is spot-on.  The news media just falls over itself fawning over them.  As the media goes, so goes the nation.  The media says that people are looking to the son of jeb as the next best hope for a continuation of that dynasty and of all they have done for the United States.  Except for that little incident of tearing up the yard with a car and breaking into her house after an argument with his girlfriend, the media isn&#8217;t bothered with that and considers him perfect for any public office.  They&#8217;d probably reduce the age limit to make him fit tomorrow if they could do it.  People who don&#8217;t have aristocratic blood in their background would be disqualified from most such jobs for these endearing youthful indiscretions.  There are different rules for different classes of people.  The cute little vandalism thing was just mentioned in passing in the media promo piece.  What it means is they&#8217;re going to promote and probably get their wish in the future.  It would never have any impact on a political future if you have the right party or bloodline.  NBC hasn&#8217;t been worth much for some time, but neither have the newspapers.  It&#8217;s been the worst network, before Fox became what it was in the mid-90s, for a lot longer.  Around or before 2000, newspaper columnists were talking about how the most unqualified candidate wouldn&#8217;t be such a bad thing because his running mate was the experienced head of Halliburton and former war secretary and how his office would be just a short distance down the hall if the texas governor had any real problems.  They were given the chance and both showed just what a heckuva job they could both do.  Whether they were successful or not depends on how you measure success.  What is certain is that they did not benefit the proletariat who never mattered to people like them anyway.  Speaking of which, why is the daughter of no. 2 on the tube all the time now?  Ever since that crew left, the daughter has been given a forum like no other spawn.  The media is there to influence opinion.  Planting non-news and endorsing and endearing people who have done nothing for the people they are supposed to work for and the people will be sentimental about what a great bunch of people and will be begging to have them remain in office or as high up as possible. Real reporting might actually ask about nine eleven as well as documentaries about what happened in the 1930s with Smedley Butler.  Guess which patriarch of which dynastic family was implicated in that?  Instead, you are treated to nonsense.  Chelsea was not a troublemaker and she did her work without doing anything embarrassing.  She was mercilessly treated by people who made a lot of unfunny jokes at her expense.  The same mindless set got so upset at anyone who dared utter a syllable of disapproval against less restrained young people in another family.  Why would anyone want to have anything to do or listen to anything that family has to say?  They managed to run up an impossible debt and bring a nation to the abyss with 2 wars of choice.  This running up of debt worked against the incumbent in 1992.  Yet, 8 years later, people knowing what it had been like under the same mindset were happy to submit to it and ran to it for protection after having been failed during the awful attacks in New York, PA and Washington.  It didn&#8217;t go well for the victims of Katrina because the relative pittance for levee repairs couldn&#8217;t be found.  Halliburton received a whole lot more and delivered nothing.  It all seems to be working out very nicely for the family of which you speak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
